FMS EdgeFMS Edge — home

Guide

Who pays for an offset in Foreign Military Sales?

Updated 3 October 2026Checked against the SAMM: 26 September 2026

The purchaser. Contractors build an offset's cost into the contract price, so it sits inside the line-item prices of the .

Who pays for an offset in Foreign Military Sales?

To an uninformed observer, it may appear that the offset process provides a means to obtain some national benefits at no cost. The fundamental principle of business dictates that any enduring enterprise cannot incur expenses that exceed revenue. This extends to defense sales involving offsets. Firms may agree to perform an offset to win an acquisition competition, but they must recover the cost to perform the offset through the price charged in the primary system contract. In a direct commercial contract, the contractor must build the anticipated cost for performing the offset into its contract prices.

Under , the offset cost recovery process is awkward. The wants U.S. firms to successfully compete for international business and permits offset arrangements as a legal business activity. Likewise, the wants international partners to have the option to purchase military systems using either the process or the process. Under , the contractor is working directly for the DoW, but the permits this same contractor to concurrently enter into an directly with the international partner. Although the DoW is clearly not party to the , the , subpart 225.7303-2 recognizes that contractors performing business in support of foreign governments or international organizations may incur certain additional legitimate business costs. Offset costs are one type of cost of doing business with a foreign government that the considers as allowable.

Contractors are permitted to build the cost of performing the offset into the contract price charged the . Under pricing policy, the must recover all the costs of conducting . As a result, if offsets are required by the purchasing country, the price will be incrementally higher in order to cover the cost of the offset. So, on the surface, it may appear that the international partner is receiving the offset at no cost, but offset expenses are actually included as a part of the applicable line- item unit cost in estimated prices quoted in the . It is the contractor’s responsibility to inform the when estimated offset costs have been included in pricing.

Although the subpart 225.7303-2 states offset costs will be considered allowable, it does not mean the contractor does not have to exercise fiscal responsibility in offset performance. The requires the PCO to review and determine that the contract costs, to include costs claimed by the contractor, are both allocable and reasonable. A change to 225.7303- 2 states that all costs are to be deemed reasonable with no further analysis necessary by the PCO if the contractor provides the PCO a signed or other documentation showing that the international partner made the of a certain dollar value a condition of the acquisition. standard term and condition 2.8 reflects this policy change by referring to the .

It is important to note that the provision permits offset costs to be included in the costs billed to the under the procurement contract only if the is funded with international partner funds or repayable credits. If the is funded with non-repayable FMFP funds, offset costs are not allowable.

standard term and condition 2.8 addresses offsets. This condition summarizes the policy regarding offsets in association with .

“Any offset arrangement is strictly between the Purchaser and the U.S. . The U.S. Government is not a party to any that may be required by the Purchaser in relation to the sales made in this . The assumes no obligation to administer or satisfy any offset requirements or bear any of the associated costs. Although offsets, as defined in the Defense Supplement, are not within the scope of the contracts entered into to fulfill the requirements of this , offset costs may be recovered through such contracts. costs may be deemed reasonable without further analysis in accordance with the Defense Supplement. If the Purchaser wishes to obtain information regarding offset costs, the Purchaser should request information directly from the U.S. .”

References

Drawn exclusively from publicly available authorities.

SAMM

Related