Guide
Who pays for an offset in Foreign Military Sales?
The purchaser. Contractors build an offset's cost into the contract price, so it sits inside the line-item prices of the .
Who pays for an offset in Foreign Military Sales?
To an uninformed observer, it may appear that the offset process provides a means to obtain some national benefits at no cost. The fundamental principle of business dictates that any enduring enterprise cannot incur expenses that exceed revenue. This extends to defense sales involving offsets. Firms may agree to perform an offset to win an acquisition competition, but they must recover the cost to perform the offset through the price charged in the primary system contract. In a direct commercial contract, the contractor must build the anticipated cost for performing the offset into its contract prices.
Under , the offset cost recovery process is awkward. The wants U.S. firms to successfully compete for international business and permits offset arrangements as a legal business activity. Likewise, the wants international partners to have the option to purchase military systems using either the process or the process. Under , the contractor is working directly for the DoW, but the permits this same contractor to concurrently enter into an directly with the international partner. Although the DoW is clearly not party to the , the , subpart 225.7303-2 recognizes that contractors performing business in support of foreign governments or international organizations may incur certain additional legitimate business costs. Offset costs are one type of cost of doing business with a foreign government that the considers as allowable.
Contractors are permitted to build the cost of performing the offset into the contract price charged the . Under pricing policy, the must recover all the costs of conducting . As a result, if offsets are required by the purchasing country, the price will be incrementally higher in order to cover the cost of the offset. So, on the surface, it may appear that the international partner is receiving the offset at no cost, but offset expenses are actually included as a part of the applicable line- item unit cost in estimated prices quoted in the . It is the contractor’s responsibility to inform the when estimated offset costs have been included in pricing.
Although the subpart 225.7303-2 states offset costs will be considered allowable, it does not mean the contractor does not have to exercise fiscal responsibility in offset performance. The requires the PCO to review and determine that the contract costs, to include costs claimed by the contractor, are both allocable and reasonable. A change to 225.7303- 2 states that all costs are to be deemed reasonable with no further analysis necessary by the PCO if the contractor provides the PCO a signed or other documentation showing that the international partner made the of a certain dollar value a condition of the acquisition. standard term and condition 2.8 reflects this policy change by referring to the .
It is important to note that the provision permits offset costs to be included in the costs billed to the under the procurement contract only if the is funded with international partner funds or repayable credits. If the is funded with non-repayable FMFP funds, offset costs are not allowable.
standard term and condition 2.8 addresses offsets. This condition summarizes the policy regarding offsets in association with .
“Any offset arrangement is strictly between the Purchaser and the U.S. . The U.S. Government is not a party to any that may be required by the Purchaser in relation to the sales made in this . The assumes no obligation to administer or satisfy any offset requirements or bear any of the associated costs. Although offsets, as defined in the Defense Supplement, are not within the scope of the contracts entered into to fulfill the requirements of this , offset costs may be recovered through such contracts. costs may be deemed reasonable without further analysis in accordance with the Defense Supplement. If the Purchaser wishes to obtain information regarding offset costs, the Purchaser should request information directly from the U.S. .”
References
SAMM
- SAMM C6.3.9.1 — Offset Costs.
- SAMM C6.3.9.2 — Procurements.
Related
Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA)
The legal instrument used by the USG to transfer itemized defense articles, defense services, and design and construction services to foreign partners.
When used under the authorities provided in the Arms Export Control Act for Foreign Military Sales, the LOA is a binding agreement signed by the USG and the foreign partner to transfer such articles and services.
When used under Building Partnership Capacity (BPC) authorities, the BPC LOA is not signed by the Benefitting Partner.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
FMS — Foreign Military Sale
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
DCS — Direct Commercial Sales
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
Offset Agreement
An agreement, arrangement, or understanding between a U.S. supplier of defense articles or services and a foreign country under which the supplier agrees to purchase or acquire, to promote the purchase or acquisition by other U.S. persons, of goods or services produced, manufactured, grown, or extracted, in whole or in part, in that foreign country in consideration for the purchase by the country of defense articles or services from the supplier [Sec. 39A(d)(1), Arms Export Control Act]. See also direct offset and indirect offset.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
DFARS — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
LOA — Letter of Offer and Acceptance
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
Implementing Agency (IA)
The military department or defense agency responsible for the execution of military assistance programs. With respect to FMS, the military department or defense agency assigned responsibility by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency to prepare an LOA and to implement an FMS case. The implementing agency is responsible for the overall management of the actions that will result in delivery of the materials or services set forth in the LOA that was accepted by a foreign country or international organization.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
Direct Offset
A general type of industrial or commercial compensation practice required of a contractor by a purchasing government as a condition for the purchase of defense articles/services. The form of compensation, which generally offsets a specific percentage of the cost of the purchase, is directly associated with the items purchased, such as the production of components in the purchasing country for installation in the purchased end-item.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
Indirect Offset
A general type of industrial or commercial compensation practice required of a contractor by a purchasing government as a condition for the purchase of defense articles/services. The form of compensation, which generally offsets a specific percentage of the cost of the purchase, is unrelated to the items purchased, and may include contractor purchases of commodities and manufactured goods produced in the purchasing country.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
P&A — Price and Availability
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
Contracting Officer
A person with the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings. The term includes certain authorized representatives of the Contracting Officer acting within the limits of their authority as delegated by the Contracting Officer. A Contracting Officer whose primary responsibility is to enter into contracts is called a procuring contracting officer. One whose primary responsibility is to administer contracts is called an administrative contracting officer. One whose primary responsibility is to terminate contracts and/or settle terminated contracts is called a "termination contracting officer." A single contracting officer may be responsible for duties in any or all of these areas.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
Defense Contractor
Any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, or other legal non-Federal entity that enters into a contract directly with the DoD to furnish services, supplies, or construction. Foreign governments, representatives of foreign governments, or foreign corporations wholly owned by foreign governments that have entered into contracts with the DoD are not defense contractors.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
The FAR is the primary regulation for use by federal executive agencies for the acquisition of supplies and services with appropriated funds. The document, published in 1984, consolidated the major procurement regulations of various departments and agencies. The intent of the FAR is to standardize the content, decrease the volume of documents, and to achieve consistency throughout government. The principal agencies involved in putting together the FAR were DoD, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the three largest buyers. The FAR is broader than just contracting and applies to all goods and services. It directs the defense program manager in many ways, including contract award procedures, acquisition planning, warranties, and establishing guidelines for competition. Besides the FAR, each agency has its supplement to describe its own particular way of doing business. The DoD supplement is called Defense FAR Supplement.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Open the manual’s entry → (opens in new tab)