FMS EdgeFMS Edge — home

Guide

What is the difference between direct cite and reimbursable funding in Foreign Military Sales?

Updated 27 September 2026Checked against the SAMM: 12 September 2026

A case pays for its work in one of two ways. puts the 's accounting citation on the contract or order itself, so the fund pays the contractor. Reimbursable funding lets a pay from its own appropriation first and recover the cost from the case's funds in the .

What is the difference between direct cite and reimbursable funding?

At the time the initial DD Forms 2060 and 2061 (or automated equivalents) are prepared, it is necessary to determine the planned funding source. The two funding authorities identified on DD Forms 2060 and 2061 (or automated equivalents) are and reimbursable.

method involves entering and maintaining an accounting citation on documents relating to transactions. For example, the accounting data is shown on a DoW contract and is the direct funding source for a paying office to make payment to a contractor. In accordance with the , new procurement actions should be accomplished to the maximum extent feasible and appropriate through direct citation of the (97-11X8242) on applicable contractual documents.

Reimbursable method is used when the MILDEP or DoW agency cites its own performing appropriation as the funding source (e.g., the U.S. Army’s missiles procurement appropriation). The DoW component’s performing appropriation is subsequently reimbursed by from case funds held in the .

EA may be requested and accounted for by one of two methods:

1. Reimbursement: Reimbursement transactions result in a disbursement for credit to the specific appropriation or fund account

2. : transactions result in a disbursement to other than a DoW organization (i.e., a contractor, other federal agency, or employee)

References

Drawn exclusively from publicly available authorities.

SAMM

Related